The Professional theme validates since at least 1.4.0 (longer, IIRC). And there's nothing in Geeklog that should prevent producing valid HTML.
bye, Dirk
Are we talking about the site from your profile?
Doesn't look that bad to me. You have a lot of errors because of reused id attributes (an id should be unique - you should change those to classes). A few missing UL tags around LIs (something that Geeklog's default theme also did for a while), a couple of things that are probably due to wrongly nested tags, and near the end of the list a few XHTML tags.
From what I can see, it should be easy to get those down to, say, 10-20 errors quickly. Be sure to actually read what the validator has to say about the errors - those hints usually contain all you need to know.
bye, Dirk
I did not use any microsoft program at all
I did not use any microsoft program at all