Welcome to Geeklog, Anonymous Wednesday, July 09 2025 @ 02:37 pm EDT
Geeklog Forums
gallery inbeded
Status: offline
Forum User
Full Member
Registered: 10/09/03
Posts: 161
Hi for those who use gallery >
I found a bug
it seams that in lib-common( 1.3.9sr1) the new code is not getting the header right for gallery (1.41)
I just found this so i am not shure witch line it is
but commenting out line 783 to 1048 and replacing it with the old code (1.3.8rs4) seams to work
i will be going over the code tonight and tomarow
I found a bug
it seams that in lib-common( 1.3.9sr1) the new code is not getting the header right for gallery (1.41)
I just found this so i am not shure witch line it is
but commenting out line 783 to 1048 and replacing it with the old code (1.3.8rs4) seams to work
i will be going over the code tonight and tomarow
10
10
Quote
Status: offline
Forum User
Full Member
Registered: 09/29/02
Posts: 820
I use the 1.3.10 from the CVS and have no problem. Going back might not be a good idea.
Sam
Sam
8
10
Quote
Status: offline
Forum User
Full Member
Registered: 09/29/02
Posts: 820
I use the 1.3.10 from the CVS and have no problem. Going back might not be a good idea.
Sam
Sam
11
8
Quote
I commented in the other thread, but just delete the wrapper.header and wrapper.footer files. It worked for me after that. I explained in the other thread too.
9
15
Quote
Status: offline
Forum User
Full Member
Registered: 10/09/03
Posts: 161
well last night i did a clean install fo gallery(1.4.3 pl2)
with gl1.3.9sr2 , with the new lib-common and it works now .
I am not shure why using the old gallery did not work,when i only updated gl ?
but hay i am running win XP
so who knows!!!
with gl1.3.9sr2 , with the new lib-common and it works now .
I am not shure why using the old gallery did not work,when i only updated gl ?
but hay i am running win XP

9
10
Quote
Status: offline
Site Admin
Admin
Registered: 01/12/02
Posts: 13073
Quote by JohnVanVliet: I am not shure why using the old gallery did not work,when i only updated gl ?
Geeklog's COM_siteHeader() function behaves differently in 1.3.9 as compared to earlier versions. The built-in Geeklog support in Gallery is made for Geeklog 1.3.9, the unofficial integration hack was made for earlier versions.
So if you pick the wrong versions of both packages, chances are that it won't work ...
bye, Dirk
13
12
Quote
All times are EDT. The time is now 02:37 pm.
- Normal Topic
- Sticky Topic
- Locked Topic
- New Post
- Sticky Topic W/ New Post
- Locked Topic W/ New Post
- View Anonymous Posts
- Able to post
- Filtered HTML Allowed
- Censored Content