The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Are you getting spam on your Geeklog site?
Authored by:Dirk on Friday, March 25 2005 @ 08:14 AM EST
The idea behind this and the other poll is to get a feel if and how spam really is a problem for Geeklog sites these days. Technically, the SpamX plugin should pretty much take care of it, but how much spam do you actually see?
Authored by:trip on Saturday, May 07 2005 @ 04:31 AM EDT
SpamX did well, but for some reason, I got some whack-o's trying to comment spam me. The key work to block was "i n C est" In case you've been hit by these sick-os (naturaly, remove the spaces). After a while of their posts being blocked, they have tried a whole lot less.
Authored by:ByteEnable on Friday, March 25 2005 @ 01:28 PM EST
Spamx does a very good job. However, I still get targeted by porn guys occasionally. So I added in key words to whack'em. With that said, I modified the comment code to put in rel="nofollow" for the ones that do get through.
Authored by:ajzz on Tuesday, April 26 2005 @ 09:36 PM EDT
Referer spam seems quite prevalent with the Stats/GUS plugins. Is there some way to integrate a Spam-X like feature into the respective plugins? Or does this even make sense?
Authored by:Dirk on Wednesday, April 27 2005 @ 01:26 PM EDT
Referer spam should be blocked as early as possible, i.e. by the webserver, so that it doesn't create extra load (due to the need to create a session, etc.).
Authored by:ajzz on Wednesday, April 27 2005 @ 04:55 PM EDT
Ah, going the .htaccess way seems indeed a step more preemptive than using the ban plugin (as things stand now on my site).
Unfortunately, my host is very unhappy enabling .htaccess overrides. This made me question whether something like the ban or Spam-X could be integrated with stats/gus. However, in light of your post, it looks like such integration would not release much load on the server and seems unnecessary. The only benefit i can think of off hand is that a world-readable stats plugin would not provide free links to the next free-dvd-copy .com (google-fed pearl script). But we already have a ban plugin for that.
On a different note, the article you (Dirk) refer to is very useful in general. Is there some place where such informative articles are collected - FAQs? Is something like "Hardening a Geeklog Site" worthy of a support forum topic since it goes beyond installation or plugin help and general stuff?
Authored by:Dirk on Friday, April 29 2005 @ 06:11 PM EDT
Well, it seems like there is a way. It still requires the PHP interpreter to be fired up, so it needs more resources than the .htaccess approach, but integrating it into lib-common.php before the sessions are created will at least keep the load off of the database.
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
The idea behind this and the other poll is to get a feel if and how spam really is a problem for Geeklog sites these days. Technically, the SpamX plugin should pretty much take care of it, but how much spam do you actually see?
---
www.antisource.com
spam me. The key work to block was "i n C est" In case you've been hit by
these sick-os (naturaly, remove the spaces). After a while of their posts being
blocked, they have tried a whole lot less.
LinuxElectrons
---
LinuxElectrons
Referer spam should be blocked as early as possible, i.e. by the webserver, so that it doesn't create extra load (due to the need to create a session, etc.).
I've explained how to do this here.
The Spam-X plugin only kicks in once somebody actually tries to post something, so it wouldn't help against referer spam.
bye, Dirk
Unfortunately, my host is very unhappy enabling .htaccess overrides. This made me question whether something like the ban or Spam-X could be integrated with stats/gus. However, in light of your post, it looks like such integration would not release much load on the server and seems unnecessary. The only benefit i can think of off hand is that a world-readable stats plugin would not provide free links to the next free-dvd-copy .com (google-fed pearl script). But we already have a ban plugin for that.
On a different note, the article you (Dirk) refer to is very useful in general. Is there some place where such informative articles are collected - FAQs? Is something like "Hardening a Geeklog Site" worthy of a support forum topic since it goes beyond installation or plugin help and general stuff?
Thanks,
Ajay
The article above is linked from the FAQ entry How can I speed up my Geeklog site?
I do actually intend to write up a similar FAQ entry on security issues, but haven't found the time and inspiration yet ...
bye, Dirk
Well, it seems like there is a way. It still requires the PHP interpreter to be fired up, so it needs more resources than the .htaccess approach, but integrating it into lib-common.php before the sessions are created will at least keep the load off of the database.
bye, Dirk