Welcome to Geeklog Sunday, May 19 2013 @ 11:56 AM EDT
|
||||||||
![]() |
Forum Index > Support > General Geeklog Support |
New Topic
|
Post Reply
|
A registered user with a blank username??? |
|||
| tingo |
|
||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Chatty ![]() Status: offline ![]() Registered: 06/05/02 Posts: 57 |
I have discovered a strange problem with one of my Geeklog sites (this site currently runs GL version 1.3.8-1sr5).
A user has somehow been able to register her user with a blank or empty username. obviously, she can't log in with that user, but I'm more curious how this could happen at all? Here is a sql query from the database: PHP Formatted Code mysql> select uid, username, email, regdate from gl_users where uid = 10 or uid = 13 or uid = 123; +-----+----------+--------------------+---------------------+ | uid | username | email | regdate | +-----+----------+--------------------+---------------------+ | 10 | t2 | t2@nowhere.com | 2003-04-02 23:16:00 | | 13 | oxxxxx | oxxxxx@limbo.no | 2003-04-03 16:04:00 | | 123 | | gmxxxxxx@xxxxxx.no | 2004-06-29 00:07:00 | +-----+----------+--------------------+---------------------+ 3 rows in set (0.00 sec) Question 1; How do I find out if the username field is empty ofr contains a blank character? Question 2: does it matter? I searched here and on Google, but couldn't find any description of a similar problem. Is this a bug in Geeklog, or is it something that have crept in with one of the Geeklog updates I have done? |
||||||
|
|||||||
| Robin |
|
||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Full Member Status: offline ![]() Registered: 02/15/02 Posts: 725 |
Quote by tingo: I'm more curious how this could happen at all? A bug in older version. This issue has been discussed already here. To avoid that in the future upgrade your GL installation to 1.3.9. Geeklog Polish Support Team |
||||||
|
|||||||
| tingo |
|
||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Chatty ![]() Status: offline ![]() Registered: 06/05/02 Posts: 57 |
Quote by Robin: A bug in older version. This issue has been discussed already here. Hmm, funny I couldn't find it when I searched this forum. Can anyone point me to the correct thread? |
||||||
|
|||||||
| Robin |
|
||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Full Member Status: offline ![]() Registered: 02/15/02 Posts: 725 |
Geeklog Polish Support Team |
||||||
|
|||||||
| Dirk |
|
||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Admin ![]() Status: offline ![]() Registered: 01/12/02 Posts: 13027 |
|||||||
|
|||||||
| tingo |
|
||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Chatty ![]() Status: offline ![]() Registered: 06/05/02 Posts: 57 |
Quote by Dirk: For the record: Here is the bug report. It was fixed a year ago ... Hmm, if it was fixed a year ago, how come it happened on a 1.3.8-1sr5 Geeklog installation, less than two months ago? I mean, 1.3.8-1sr4 was announced in January, and the site was running that version when this error happened. |
||||||
|
|||||||
| Blaine |
|
||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Full Member ![]() Status: offline ![]() Registered: 07/16/02 Posts: 1233 |
I'm not sure when 1.3.9 was released right now but we generally resolve bugs in new releases only and don't go back. Only in the case of a security related fix do we create a SR (Security-release) as well for one version back. So 1.3.8-SR4 is a 1.3.8 + security related fixes but won't include other bug fixes that are part of 1.3.9.
Thats just my quess without going thru CVS records. Geeklog components by PortalParts -- www.portalparts.com |
||||||
|
|||||||
| Content generated in: 1.34 seconds |
|
|
|