|
The Ultimate Weblog System |
ResourcesGetting startedSupport Development SectionsGeeklog (190)
Geeklog 2 (28)
Announcements (201)
Summer of Code (8)
Security (55)
Plugins (50)
Server (26)
Spam (10)
What's NewSTORIESNo new storiesCOMMENTS last 2 daysNo new commentsTRACKBACKS last 2 daysNo new trackback commentsNEW FILES last 14 daysLINKS last 2 weeksNo recent new linksOlder StoriesMonday 17-MarTuesday 08-JanSaturday 29-DecTuesday 04-DecSunday 04-Nov |
Welcome to Geeklog
Thursday, May 15 2008 @ 11:32 PM EDT Which Template System
Tuesday, December 18 2001 @ 01:42 AM EST
Contributed by: Anonymous Views: 2,465  Hum, how about using Smarty as a template system? I thought you wants speed + security at the top, so make your benchmarks with speed and compare Smarty and PHPLib! Also, PHPLib is out-dated, it's phpver 3 code. However, please think about.
Tell me more
Authored by: Tony on
Tuesday, December 18 2001 @ 06:43 AM EST
No link? No explanation as to why it is better?
The PHPLib decision was made because I needed to get it done and we were dancing around which template system to use. It\'s memory footprint is minimal (350 lines of code). It supported nested templates and was object oriented. All template systems negativley impact performance. That is a fact. So what makes this system your suggesting so fast? Remember, you\'re talking to a PHP coder here so the more specific the better. Tell me more
Authored by: MLimburg on
Tuesday, December 18 2001 @ 06:27 PM EST
SMARTY rocks. Yes. However, SMARTY requires PEAR. Bad Smarty, Naughty Smarty.
PHPLib is old. Read also, PHPLib is well tested and stable. I do think we need to adress these issues, but I think this is a GL2 issue. |
| © 2002-2008 Geeklog Created this page in 0.66 seconds |
Powered By Geeklog 1.4.1 Hosted by pair.com |